We talked a lot about sheep - communal animals, vulnerable, and valuable for wool, food, and milk. We talked about raising sheep in the Middle East, and how the sheep were generally travelling - none of this 'put the sheep in the pasture by Michigan State with donkey' bit.
Anyway, two thoughts that were a good kick in the pants, err, stood out to me. The first is that following Jesus often involves movement, especially movement to places I wouldn't naturally go. The second thought was that an inherent part of following Jesus is whether other people follow me as I follow him. It's easy for me to loose focus, especially that following Jesus isn't a purely nebulous 'do good' type idea, but there's a very concrete application. I don't think our concept of teaching (e.g. verbal instruction) quite captures the essence of this application, but neither does the nebulous 'do good' idea.
Meanwhile there was a fascinating comment to my last entry:
So you believe that Christian people are the only people in the world that love others unconditionally... w/o self-protection?I'm still thinking that one through, mostly because I wrestle a lot on what exactly the Bible means in teaching that we're fallen (depraved?) and how that interacts with our experiential observations of people.
What about Gandhi? He wasn't remotely Christian. Yet removing all the supernatural implications he might have lived a better and more productive life than Jesus.
ReplyDeleteHe argued non-violence to the level of laying down your arms in front of your enemy and allowing yourself to be slaughtered.
fascinating, eh?