We talked a lot about sheep - communal animals, vulnerable, and valuable for wool, food, and milk. We talked about raising sheep in the Middle East, and how the sheep were generally travelling - none of this 'put the sheep in the pasture by Michigan State with donkey' bit.
Anyway, two thoughts that were a good kick in the pants, err, stood out to me. The first is that following Jesus often involves movement, especially movement to places I wouldn't naturally go. The second thought was that an inherent part of following Jesus is whether other people follow me as I follow him. It's easy for me to loose focus, especially that following Jesus isn't a purely nebulous 'do good' type idea, but there's a very concrete application. I don't think our concept of teaching (e.g. verbal instruction) quite captures the essence of this application, but neither does the nebulous 'do good' idea.
Meanwhile there was a fascinating comment to my last entry:
So you believe that Christian people are the only people in the world that love others unconditionally... w/o self-protection?I'm still thinking that one through, mostly because I wrestle a lot on what exactly the Bible means in teaching that we're fallen (depraved?) and how that interacts with our experiential observations of people.
1 comment:
What about Gandhi? He wasn't remotely Christian. Yet removing all the supernatural implications he might have lived a better and more productive life than Jesus.
He argued non-violence to the level of laying down your arms in front of your enemy and allowing yourself to be slaughtered.
fascinating, eh?
Post a Comment